Search for: "Office Factor, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 4,434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2018, 8:41 pm by Patent Docs
Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) cancelling registration of his mark "WU DANG TAI CHI GREEN TEA" due to a likelihood of confusion with Diamond Hong, Inc.'s registered mark, "TAI CHI," pursuant to 15 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:10 am by tom
Nantkwest, Inc., that in appeals from proceedings at the Patent Office, the patent applicant will not be responsible for the fees of the Patent Officer’s attorneys and paralegals. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 12:00 am by Spiro Hristopoulos
Jones Jr. serves as a director for Connecture, Inc. and MyHealthDirect, Inc., Mr. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:36 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Contact the offices of Guelph employment lawyer Peter McSherry. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:36 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Contact the offices of Guelph employment lawyer Peter McSherry. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:08 am by Andrew Stoltmann
Stoltmann Law Offices continues to investigate National Securities Corp broker Jonathan Aschoff and his recommendations of the following Biotech securities: Avenue Therapeutics Inc (ATXI.O); Checkpoint Therapeutics Inc (CKPT.O); and Mustang Bio Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:10 pm by David Smyth
In that case, Bankosky had been a director in the business development group at Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. [read post]
23 May 2018, 10:01 am by Andrew Stoltmann
Stoltmann Law Offices is interested in hearing from those individuals who may have been recommended or sold Cytori Therapeutics Inc. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:51 am by Kenneth B. Weckstein
Inc., the protestors argued that the contracting officer had improperly excluded them from the competitive range in a best value acquisition for a blanket purchase agreement (BPA) under the Federal Supply Schedule (FSS). [read post]
5 May 2020, 9:32 pm by Scott McKeown
Fintiv, Inc., IPR2020-00019, Paper 11 (March 20, 2020), which lists six factors to be assessed in such scenarios.The precedential Order (here) lays out six factors (Apple factors) that the Board considers in determining whether to exercise its discretion to institute review when there is a related proceeding pending in district court, these factors, along with the Board’s explanation of each is provided below. 1. [read post]